Category Archives: Future Communications

Mention in Speech Technology 2009

0
Filed under Future Communications, It's About Time

We were pleased to see an article by Moshe Yudkowsky in Speech Technology Magazine about the RebelVox solution. It’s fun to hear the product described as “riveting”.

In March, I went to the Emerging Communications Conference (eComm) in San Francisco. There, a San Francisco-based voice communications platform vendor named RebelVox gave a riveting demonstration of a telephony interface that eliminates almost all of the overhead of making a telephone call. The company separates the act of sending your voice from making a connection, both of which are no longer bound in a rigid, linear time sequence. As a user, I select the name of the person I want to call from a list in what appears to be a standard instant messaging client. The application brings up a history of all of my calls and text and voice messages in typical IM format. I then touch the talk button and start to speak: My voice message transfers immediately to the person I’m calling.

New User Experience for Voice

1
Filed under Future Communications

Visuals from the presentation our Vice President of Technology Matt Ranney gave at eComm 2009 have been posted online (see the slides below to follow along with the video):

and

Thanks to Lee S Dryburgh at eComm.

What in the world is a “phone”?

0
Filed under Future Communications, Telephony

First there is the telephone, which is something that sits on a table or desk. Then there is the mobile phone (cell phone), which is something you can carry around with you. They both allow you to make “calls”. So what is the “phone” part? It is a device that has connectivity to the PSTN (public switched telephone network) and, when it makes a connection to another device, enables you to talk to that device live. (Now the device might be another phone, or it might be the voice mail system, or an answering machine.) There are some other twiddly-bits to a phone, but that is the basic idea. VoIP systems can bypass the PSTN sometimes when they run on the internet only, but otherwise work pretty much like phones. (VoIP does create streams of packets, but does it in such a way as to create a virtual circuit and connect you live to your destination (in order to be just like a phone.))

We have historically delivered this functionality with specialized devices that are dedicated to this task. Even modern smart phones, which do a lot of other things like take pictures and run web applications, have a special part of the device that is still just a phone with  historic phone behaviors (create a circuit to another device and allow a live call to take place.) We’ve added on more stuff, but left the phone function just as it has always been.

Of course, we know that what we really want is to talk to someone and have our speech delivered to that someone. Sometimes we’d like it to be live so we can talk together; and sometimes we don’t care about live. And now we have a device called a computer which, low and behold, can capture voice and deliver to others. It also has great advantages in that you can actually write applications which enable us to process the voice in other ways—not just live delivery which is all the phones do.

So why do we need phones? We don’t; or, more correctly, we won’t. We won’t need a specialized device. Basically, phones are an historic artifact from the days when we didn’t have computers. And they won’t go away immediately because they have an enormous infrastructure (think companies and network and hardware) that has yet to be re-purposed—that infrastructure can only manage a phone just the way it is currently conceived.

But it is all changing. The evolution is coming from both directions. Mobile phones are getting to be computers. And computers are getting to be so small and mobile that they are indistinguishable from phones. And networks are becoming more and more general purpose pipes to move our data and our voices.

So, without an enormous bout of innovation, what we think of as a phone is going to be obsolete. Not tomorrow, and not next year, but eventually. Eventually we will use computers of all sizes (like telephones and mobile phones today) and of varying degrees of mobility. They will come from what we think of now as phone manufacturers, but will also come from traditional and newly modeled computer manufacturers.

The really good news is that we’ll finally get some more sophisticated applications that will serve us better by saving wasted time, doing things when and how we want, and connecting us seamlessly to anyone in the world.

But it will no longer be a phone.

PS. You may think of your iPhone or your Blackberry as a general purpose device. But really they both embody two devices. One is the regular old phone system; and one is a multi-purpose computer. And so far, the power of the computer has not been unleashed for the “phone call” usage. Now you have a device that is a phone and a computer, but eventually you’ll be able to lose the “phone”.

RebelVox on TechCrunch

0
Filed under Future Communications, Human Efficiency

Friday RebelVox got noticed on TechCrunch—with just a brief note about what we do. In addition, the day was an internal anniversary of sorts; so a special day all around.

The TechCrunch post illustrates a few of the challenges we face in trying to communicate about our core functionality and how it affects communication applications. Every analogy we use falls short–email is close in one regard; but then our protocol provides live voice. Voice messaging comes close but then we support asynchronous (and synchronous, for that matter) text. Push-to-talk is interesting—but we support an infinite degree of time shifting.

So how are we like email?

  • You get to talk or listen whether you have good network or not, in the same way you can do email on an airplane.
  • At the moment you talk, the other participants don’t have to be paying attention; and you never interrupt them.
  • You can get all your voice on any and every device anywhere, because it lives in the cloud.
  • You can save whatever voice conversations you want, just like email.
  • You can listen, review, replay, respond any time you want.
  • When RebelVox is integrated into the email infrastructure, you can can use email addresses for voice instead of phone numbers.

How are we like push to talk?

  • You can talk instantly. (But with RebelVox it doesn’t have to blare out the other’s speakers until they want it.)
  • You save time because there is no setup network time (no ringing, no messages, no prompts). Choose! Talk! Done! A five second message takes five seconds.
  • You can have preset conversations with any number of people—think of them as channels that do not have to be live. But can be live with anyone, whenever they want.

How are we like voice mail?

  • Well, we never like to compare ourselves to voice mail, but….
  • You can leave messages and listen to time shifted messages; but they are stored in meaningful contexts and can be among multiple parties.
  • And, did I mention that with RebelVox they can be live? (As in screening calls, playing faster, catching up to live.)

How are we totally unique?

  • Live voice, voice messaging (time shifted voice), text, location, and video all rendezvous in the same conversations, protocol, and applications. Nothing has to be unified because it is all one.
  • Only a RebelVox application or protocol enables you to seamlessly transition between live voice and time shifted voice, either direction, at the whim of how people use the system moment to moment.
  • Voice messages can transition into live calls and users can screen calls, play them faster, and catch up to live on a call with one party or many (including conference calls).
  • No other voice system that support live calls also extends the range of a challenged network by gracefully dealing with bandwidth shortfalls and extending voice when no live voice can take place. (We freely admit that we cannot manufacture bits where no bits are to be had.)
  • Only RebelVox persists all voice and once we’ve persisted conversations and their media, live voice becomes data and applications can be built to use voice in many meaningful ways: embedded in applications, voice as a media of record, transcriptions, translations, after action reviews, and other kinds of search, filters, and restructuring.

Only Rebelvox incorporates all the functionality of email, live voice, voice messaging, and text messaging together in one application and gives perfect control to both the sender and receiver over how they want to interact with their communications.

eComm Wrapup

0
Filed under Future Communications

The eComm conference ended yesterday and it was a whirlwind of information transfer. As per conference founder, Lee Dryburgh, it was “five days of presentations in three.” It was a very wide ranging discussion and very successful. He is to be commended for creating and leading such a quality event.

A key to the vibrancy of this conference is the carefully crafted mix of topics: innovative technology (our focus), innovative business models, new product introductions, scientific research, social research, government policy, spectrum management, and always in the mix—the future of communications.

A few interesting presentations and facts:

  • We discussed spectrum allocation a lot. I was interested to learn that much of the allocated spectrum is going unused. The FCC doesn’t have any power to make sure that the spectrum as allocated and sold is actually used. And it turns out that even if an allocation is being used, it is being utilized at a very low percentage of its capacity. Everywhere.
  • The founder of Smule, Ge Wang, spoke. Smule delivers the iPhone applications “Ocarina” and “Sonic Lighter” (among others). He gave a fascinating talk covering all of his work in music at Princeton and Harvard (he is currently an assistant professor of music at Stanford.) While all the electronic music stuff was very cool, I was struck by the depth of the operational models that the Smule applications entail. There is the application itself (play music, or light the lighter); but much more: upload when and where the ocarina is being played, share the live music with anyone or everyone else, view a global map of everywhere someone is playing an ocarina right now, score music for the ocarina and publish it in a social network. It enables other kinds of creative sparks to fly: one Sonic Lighter user traced out “Hi” on the global map  by walking certain blocks in his Los Angeles neighborhood. (See additional Sonic Lighter note below.)
  • Weird resurfacing theme: wireless microphones. Turns out that wireless microphones are unlicensed but use licensed spectrum. It came up as a topic, or joke, in 5 or 6 different talks. We were using them extensively in the room all day.
  • The breadth of voice applications was impressive. Communication enabled business processes (CEBP) was a broad theme, much more so than user focused communication tools. Even Skype’s announcement was of a new codec, SILK, and not their upcoming release. One vendor joke that they were actually “planning to make money,” which seems to be a really good reason to focus on solid business cases.
  • There were a lot of vendor announcements (SILK from Skype; Voxeo with a new IVR platform release, etc.), but RebelVox was the one vendor who was totally new to the scene. No one knew who we were coming in, so our presentation was a bit of a surprise.

Most of the presentations can be found here. Videos of the event will probably come soon.

Note: In playing with my Smule Sonic Lighter, I discovered that I couldn’t blow it out. “Emphesyma,” someone suggested. But no, it would not work. Finally I accidentally discovered that there was a user preference setting: “Wind Input”. And mine was set to “off”. This software application has an input affordance which is wind.

RebelVox at eComm

1
Filed under Future Communications

Matt Ranney, our VP Technology, did our first public presentation of our technology last Thursday in San Francisco at eComm. We were pretty pleased with the results. You can see the accompanying twitter feed.

There are also a couple of blog posts, the first notices of our coming out event:

Dean Bubley of Disruptive Wireless reports on the whole event and includes us:

Rebelvox, which has an interesting “timeshifting” voice technology, which essentially acts as a hybrid between push-to-talk and voice messaging and telephony. This is essentially another form of “non-telephony” VoIPo3G.

“Hybrid” is an interesting way to describe it.  One of our challenges is always describing what we do, for we do not “unify” something that has been separate, but rather totally replace the modalities of live voice, messaged voice, and text with something entirely different. They only look like the expected medium. Though we can make our applications behave just like the medium they replace, they are so much more dynamic, flexible, and useful after we have done our “hybrid” magic.

Alan Quayle also writes a report on the conference and mentions RebelVox.

RebelVox, new user experience for voice: Like Bubble Motion, with cute fast-play function to speed through listening to a voice message (based on a military technology), and ability to break into a live call.

It’s interesting to find us called “cute”, but good that people picked up on the tactical core of our work. Again, we come up on the difficulty of explaining something totally radical that looks a bit like things people expect. The play-faster, catch-up-to-live, and seamlessly transition into a live call really is a radical maneuver that cannot be accomplished without the RebelVox magic (patent pending, of course.)

And from Jan Linden, VP of Engineering of Global IP Solutions (which, by the way, is on our block in San Francisco) and who gave a very interesting talk on the challenges of deploying VoIP on the iPhone.

In terms of new applications/services I really liked Matt Ranney’s presentation on  RebelVox‘ technology that in a great way combines live and  asynchronous voice communications. This can be viewed as an integration of Voice SMS/IM, text IM, and live voice calls. This is definitely a type of service I would be prepared to pay for.

All in all, a good start to our public persona which will continue to evolve as we grow the company.

Communications…the Revolution is Upon Us: eComm in March

0
Filed under Future Communications, Telephony

As a traditionally software-oriented professional, it has been enlightening to realize over the past two years that telecom is now in my bailiwick. Every evolution of our software platforms and network infrastructure has been moving towards a world in which “everything” turns out to be software; but the field of telecommunications has been slower than most to feel the shift. (For interesting commentary on this, see Andreas Constantinou’s post on NaaS.)

Why? Many reasons, but most of it has to do with inertia. Any industry that has an enormous investment in infrastructure and massive existing markets will be slow to move. One finds oneself so embedded with the philosophy of simply finding a slightly better way to monetize market investments, that bold new thinking is too far outside the box to contemplate. In addition, all of our cultural assumptions concerning voice communications are pretty unyielding.

In this regard, software folks have a bit of an advantage. We are used our world being toppled into pieces with new paradigms on a regular basis. So, not only are software folks ready for the annual upset apple cart, we assume that we can “do anything with software”; and so we find some freedom to look at problems in radically different ways.

eComm 2009 in March will provide a wonderful forum where established telecom players and wildly varied “other players” will take a stab at envisioning the future of communications. They call it the “post-telecom” era bringing “cataclysmic change”, and, for sure, it is upon us. While it will take many years for the transitions we envision to play out, the game has changed. As we understand that what one does with communications (the application)  is separate from the ability to connect (the network), the power of the “application” will erode the historical control enforced by  network constraints (physical, social, and corporate).

This year’s eComm Conference has an amazing array of contributors to that future world, which is why we are excited to be a sponsor. We hope to share what we are doing, but also explore with the community there many new visions of the future.

Matt Ranney & Lee Dryburgh Chat About the Future

0
Filed under Future Communications

Lee Dryburgh has posted an interview with RebelVox VP of Technology, Matt Ranney. The conversation is far reaching—in subject as well as distance—UK to SF.

Matt discusses some of the RebelVox favorite topics:

I’m sort of dancing around the issue a bit, but the signaling, the messages, or the content you can deliver to somebody else, becoming the purpose of what you’re doing, runs into a problem with voice.  Because the ways in which voice is currently delivered are pretty awkward.  You have to get a circuit, call people, allocate a bunch of resources, get your QOS going; or get your time slices [TDM, or whatever it is that you need to so you can talk to somebody, even if you ultimately end up with voice mail.  That’s still what you need.

What we’re doing is throwing away the requirements for circuits, reserved resources, and all of those sorts of things.  We’re pushing the complexity of managing that kind of stuff all the way out to the edges.  You have these powerful devices now, your iPhones and what have you, with relatively speaking, very powerful computers on board.  They have multitasking operating systems and advanced networking capabilities.  None of these things is really being used to kind of change the way that voice works; they’re being used to run applications.  That’s neat and that’s great, but we’re going to harness the power of these smart devices to process your voice, to deliver communications with your voice, in a way that is kind of separate from the requirements imposed by the network.

Once we’re free of that, we’re free of requirements, strictly, of people’s dedicated attention.  You can have a more arbitrarily time-shifted way to listen to incoming voice or video.  You can send things without waiting for the person on the other end to acknowledge, basically without waiting for the network, without waiting for anything.  We’re respecting the sender’s time by letting them talk immediately, and respecting the receiver’s time by not necessarily interrupting them, allowing them whatever level of participation they want, at that time.

What’s really dead?

0
Filed under Future Communications

Alex Saunders has an interesting post where he claims that 2008 is the year in which VoIP died.

The truth is that voice over IP deployed to make calling cheaper (as a business model) is what has died. As regular telecom prices drop, there is an ever shrinking margin in which to try to find a way to be cheaper. Voice over the open internet—the way you make it free—has always been a little bit hit and miss. Sometimes it works; sometimes not. Dependable for some; useless for others. Of course, with our growing experience with a sometimes connected world, some of that variable utility is acceptable.

Alex makes a very good point about where things have to shift as he observes changes in the markets and the maneuvers being made to maintain relevance:

These moves betray an understanding that the future is in software, in applications, and in building products that deliver end user value rather than shaving the corners off pennies.

There are a lot of directions that this software development is going: additional mobile applications based on media, social networking, or location-based data; unified communications for enterprises; conference calling; and some indications of the futures of integrating voice into business processes. It’s an interesting point that the key software enhancements seem to have little, if nothing, to do with voice except as an input method.

At RebelVox, we are continually focused on the “end user value” that can be produced by transforming the voice application itself—a thing so ubiquitous that few truly realize that it is a software application. So well does it mimic it’s hardware origins, that if you talk about it as an application people stare at you dumbly.

But this is where software can really transform communications for the most convenient way people communicate—with their voices—if only the application served them in communicating the way they wish, instead of the way the system demands.

-Mary

Emerging Communications

0
Filed under Future Communications

RebelVox is pleased to be sponsoring a breakfast at the eComm conference in March. This conference brings the brightest and most challenging thinkers together in a technology space that is undergoing radical change from the inside and enforced transformation from the outside. These trends will continue and eComm captures the froth of ideas that are contributing to the evolution of real solutions that can meet both the infrastructure demands and usability demands of the future.

See you there!

-Mary